Talk:Expansion - Revision history

Onderduiker: /* Rename to LoD */ Reply

2026-02-18T17:40:41Z

Rename to LoD: Reply

Trang Oul: typo fix

2026-02-14T22:30:47Z

typo fix

Trang Oul at 21:56, 13 February 2026

2026-02-13T21:56:48Z

Naturelover: /* Rename to LoD */

2026-02-13T20:01:27Z

Rename to LoD

Trang Oul at 08:14, 13 February 2026

2026-02-13T08:14:44Z

Trang Oul: /* Rename to LoD */ new section

2026-02-13T08:14:30Z

Rename to LoD: new section

New page

== Rename to LoD ==

Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "Lord of Destruction" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 18 February 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Sure, it'll be a chore. Unless there is a way to download all the pages (like a git repository), edit them locally using mass replace, and then upload back ([[User:Onderduiker]], maybe you know?).		:: Sure, it'll be a chore. Unless there is a way to download all the pages (like a git repository), edit them locally using mass replace, and then upload back ([[User:Onderduiker]], maybe you know?).
	::The only issue I can think of is that D2R calls the game modes ("eras"; for example on the [https://diablo2.io/post4111285.html#p4111285 character creation screen]) "Classic", "'''Expansion'''" (not LoD) and "Reign of the Warlock". So maybe it should stay as is? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 16:56, 13 February 2026 (EST)		::The only issue I can think of is that D2R calls the game modes ("eras"; for example on the [https://diablo2.io/post4111285.html#p4111285 character creation screen]) "Classic", "'''Expansion'''" (not LoD) and "Reign of the Warlock". So maybe it should stay as is? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 16:56, 13 February 2026 (EST)
		+
		+	::: While I'm nominally an administrator and bureaucrat, this was only to allow me to deal with [[Basin_Wiki:About#Who can edit?\|vandalism]] way back in 2011. As you know, automatic account creation was then disabled, and I don't have any expertise beyond what I've picked up contributing here and elsewhere. I don't own or play Diablo II: Resurrected or Reign of the Warlock and it's not likely that I will, so for years my contributions here have really been limited to updating the Ladder page and trying to patrol edits at least once a month (although with the recent release, I'll check more often).
		+
		+	::: If the game still has Classic, Expansion and Reign of the Warlock eras, then I don't think a distinction needs to be made between Expansion and Lord of Destruction unless there are features specific to LoD but not RotW, otherwise RotW-only content can go on, or refer to, the RotW page. [[User:Onderduiker\|Onderduiker]] ([[User talk:Onderduiker\|talk]]) 12:40, 18 February 2026 (EST)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST)
 :: Sure, it'll be a chore. Unless there is a way to download all the pages (like a git repository), edit them locally using mass replace, and then upload back ([[User:Onderduiker]], maybe you know?).
-::The only issue I can think of is that D2R calls the mage modes ("eras"; on the [https://diablo2.io/post4111285.html#p4111285 character creation screen]) "Classic", "'''Expansion'''" (not LoD) and "Reign of the Warlock". So maybe it should stay as is? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 16:56, 13 February 2026 (EST)
+::The only issue I can think of is that D2R calls the game modes ("eras"; for example on the [https://diablo2.io/post4111285.html#p4111285 character creation screen]) "Classic", "'''Expansion'''" (not LoD) and "Reign of the Warlock". So maybe it should stay as is? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 16:56, 13 February 2026 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 13 February 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)		Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)
	:I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( [[User:Naturelover\|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover\|talk]]) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST)		:I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( [[User:Naturelover\|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover\|talk]]) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST)
		+	:: Sure, it'll be a chore. Unless there is a way to download all the pages (like a git repository), edit them locally using mass replace, and then upload back ([[User:Onderduiker]], maybe you know?).
		+	::The only issue I can think of is that D2R calls the mage modes ("eras"; on the [https://diablo2.io/post4111285.html#p4111285 character creation screen]) "Classic", "'''Expansion'''" (not LoD) and "Reign of the Warlock". So maybe it should stay as is? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 16:56, 13 February 2026 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 13 February 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)		Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)
		+	:I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( [[User:Naturelover\|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover\|talk]]) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 13 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Rename to LoD ==		== Rename to LoD ==

−	Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "Lord of Destruction" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)	+	Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul\|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul\|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)