Difference between revisions of "Talk:Set"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Formatting set sources: new section) |
Onderduiker (talk | contribs) (Reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Formatting set sources == | == Formatting set sources == | ||
| − | On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(''n'' items)"/"(Full)" ([ | + | On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(''n'' items)"/"(Full)" ([[Energy#Pelt|example]]), on some they're formatted as "({{S|=''n''}})" for individual item bonuses ([[Increased Attack Speed#Gloves|example]]) and "({{U|=''n''}})"/"({{U|=F}})" for set bonuses ([[Cannot be Frozen#Set bonus|example]]).<br/> |
| − | Which style is "canon"/preferred? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST) | + | Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST) |
| + | |||
| + | : There's no canon, although I think (n items) or (Full) is better. I normally prefer keeping things as short and simple as possible, but ({{S|=n}}) or ({{U|=F}}) could be mistaken for references, even without superscript. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Incidentally, if you want to link to one of our wiki pages, you don't normally need the full URL: you can just use <code><nowiki>[[Page#Section|Label]]</nowiki></code> (like the examples I edited above). [[User:Onderduiker|Onderduiker]] ([[User talk:Onderduiker|talk]]) 13:56, 27 February 2026 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:56, 27 February 2026
Formatting set sources
On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(n items)"/"(Full)" (example), on some they're formatted as "(n)" for individual item bonuses (example) and "(n)"/"(F)" for set bonuses (example).
Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? Trang Oul (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST)
- There's no canon, although I think (n items) or (Full) is better. I normally prefer keeping things as short and simple as possible, but (n) or (F) could be mistaken for references, even without superscript.
- Incidentally, if you want to link to one of our wiki pages, you don't normally need the full URL: you can just use
[[Page#Section|Label]](like the examples I edited above). Onderduiker (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2026 (EST)