Difference between revisions of "Talk:Expansion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Naturelover (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST) | Since D2R got a new expansion "[[Reign of the Warlock]]", should we rename this page to explicitly "[[Lord of Destruction]]" (and make it a disambig page, like [[Warlock]]), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? [[User:Trang Oul|Trang Oul]] ([[User talk:Trang Oul|talk]]) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST) | ||
| + | :I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( [[User:Naturelover|Naturelover]] ([[User talk:Naturelover|talk]]) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 13 February 2026
Rename to LoD
Since D2R got a new expansion "Reign of the Warlock", should we rename this page to explicitly "Lord of Destruction" (and make it a disambig page, like Warlock), since it's not "the" expansion anymore? Trang Oul (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2026 (EST)
- I'd say yes, we should do that. Downside: 141 pages link here. Fixing all of them might be a chore ... :( Naturelover (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2026 (EST)