Talk:Set

Formatting set sources

On some pages set sources have the number of items formatted plain like "(n items)"/"(Full)" (example), on some they're formatted as "(n)" for individual item bonuses (example) and "(n)"/"(F)" for set bonuses (example).
Which style is "canon"/preferred (I assume there is no reason to use both)? Trang Oul (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2026 (EST)

There's no canon, although I think (n items) or (Full) is better. I normally prefer keeping things as short and simple as possible, but (n) or (F) could be mistaken for references, even without superscript.

Incidentally, if you want to link to one of our wiki pages, you don't normally need the full URL: you can just use [[Page#Section|Label]] (like the examples I edited above). Onderduiker (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2026 (EST)